Search this blog

Wednesday, 15 May 2013

Double assassination attempt on George III 15 May 1800

George III
 from Memoirs of Queen Charlotte
by WC Oulton (1819)
A narrow miss

On 15 May 1800, George III went to Hyde Park to review the 1st Foot Guards. During the review, a shot was fired which narrowly missed the King. Mr Ongley, a clerk in the Navy Office, who was standing only a few paces away, was struck, and it was said that “had the wound been two inches higher it must have been mortal”(1).

Drama at Drury Lane

Unperturbed, the King visited the Theatre Royal, Drury Lane, in the evening with the Queen and other members of the royal family.

Michael Kelly, the musical director of the theatre at the time recorded:
"When the arrival of the King was announced, the band, as usual, played 'God save the King'. I was standing at the stage-door, opposite the royal box, to see His Majesty. The moment he entered the box, a man in the pit, next the orchestra, on the right hand, stood up on the bench, and discharged a pistol at our august Monarch, as he came to the front of the box.

Never shall I forget His Majesty’s coolness - the whole audience was in an uproar. The King, on hearing the report of the pistol, retired a pace or two, stopped, and stood firmly for an instant; then came forward to the very front of the box, put his opera-glass to his eye, and looked round the house, without the smallest appearance of alarm or discomposure."(1)

The culprit is secured

The orchestral performers seized the perpetrator - an ex-soldier named James Hadfield who was later judged insane - and dragged him into the music room under the stage, where he was examined by the Duke of York; Mr Sheridan, the theatre’s manager; and Sir William Addington, a Bow Street magistrate. The audience demanded that Hadfield should be brought on the stage, but Kelly succeeded in calming them with the assurance that he was in safe custody and that, if he were brought forward, he might have the chance to escape.

Theatre Royal, Drury Lane, from The Microcosm of London (1808-10)
Let the play go on!

Despite the Lord Chamberlain urging him to retire, George III determined to remain and see the performance. There was some suggestion that the bullet was “only a squib” (2) but after the narrow miss of the morning, it seems unlikely.

Kelly wrote: "'God save the King' was then called for, and received with shouts of applause, waving of hats, &c. During the whole of the play, the Queen and Princesses were absorbed in tears; - it was a sight never to be forgotten by those present."(1)

The play was a comedy by Colley Cibber, She would, and she would not. Kelly wrote: "Never was a piece so hurried over, for the performers were all in the greatest agitation and confusion."(1)

God save the King

At the end of the play, the audience demanded 'God save the King' again. Kelly sung an extra verse that had been written “on the spur of the moment” by Mr Sheridan, which was met with “the most rapturous approbation”(1).

The extra verse was as follows:
From every latent foe,
From the assassin’s blow.
God save the King.
O’er him thine arm extend,
For Britain’s sake defend
Our father, prince, and friend,
God save the King.

Notes
(1) From Reminiscences of Michael Kelly (1826)
(2) From George III by Christopher Hibbert (1998)

Sources used include:
Hibbert, Christopher, George III (1998, Viking, Great Britain)
Kelly, Michael, Reminiscences of Michael Kelly of the King's Theatre and Theatre Royal Drury Lane (1826)

5 comments:

  1. I feel cheated by the version of history I was taught at school! England seems to have been a much more vibrant, positively dangerously alive place. Was Hadfield really insane?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I tried to find a contemporary report of the trial but failed, so I am relying on other historians who say that he was tried for treason but acquitted on the grounds of insanity. Most of the people who attacked George III over the years seem to have been insane, or at least claimed to be!

      Delete
    2. I have discovered a post that Mike Rendell put up yesterday which has more information about Hadfield's trial: http://blog.mikerendell.com/?p=6072 - I hope you find it helpful.

      Delete
    3. At trial for High Treason, Mr Hadfield was found insane based on the evidence of his own family and soldiers he had served with and his own behaviour at trial which was completely at odds with a malignant attempt to kill. Hadfield was an apprentice to the Aldergate silversmith SHougham and, while it was never posited at trial, the mercury vapors given off by silver gilding, would have had a disasterous effect on anyone breathing them. The Case is of note because the court ordered, for the first time, that the insane person be detained at His Majesty's Pleasure. Previously if found insane you were released. The Hadfield rules are now codifed and continue through until today.

      Delete
    4. Thanks for this additional information. It is interesting to know that Hadfield's trial led to a new precedent being set.

      Delete